LAW INTELLIGENCE.
BANCO LIST. The following is the banco roll to be disposed of by his Honor Mr Justice Champman to-morrow;— Sutherland, appellant, v. Bell, respondent.—Special case of appeal from Resident Magistrate’s-Court, Switzers. Rosa v. Reith and Others.—Argument of rule nisi to rescind order granting in terrortories. ° Same v. Same—Argument of rule nisi for nonsuit, or to enter verdict for defendants Regina v. M'Oulloch and Waddel.—Argument of rule nisi for writ of prohibition. Rossv. Reith and Others.—Argument of rule nisi for new trial, or to enter up judgment for plaintiff. Otago and Southland Investment Company v. Burns.—Demurrer. Same v. Same.—Argument of rule nisi to enter verdict for defendant. Burns v. Otago and Southland Investment Company. —Motion for decree. Dunedin Waterworks Company, appellants, r. Halfway Bush Road Board, respondents.—Appeal from Resident Court, Dunedin. Brogden, appellant, v. Crowson, raspondent.—Appeal from Resident Magistrate’s Court, Dunedin. . Healey v. Heenan.—Argument of rule nisi in arrest of judgment. Kitching v. M‘Carthy.—Demurrer.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18740616.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3530, 16 June 1874, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
155LAW INTELLIGENCE. Evening Star, Issue 3530, 16 June 1874, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in