A CONTRADICTION.
To the Editor. Slß> In. your issue of to-night, I see it stated, in rgard to the case of Hunt v. Sorley, that tne plaintiff has had his limb examined by several doctors, whom X ain menturned, and that,they “ all told him some of his bones were broken, and that had he been properly treated at first, instead of for a sprain, he would have been well long before.” I beg leave to state that I never expressed any such opinion to Mr Hunt.—l am, &c., , Alex, "Young, M.D.* February 13. [We never said Dr Young did. Plaintiff’s counsel stated so.— Ed. ‘E. S.’]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18740214.2.20.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3427, 14 February 1874, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
106A CONTRADICTION. Evening Star, Issue 3427, 14 February 1874, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in