Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

- ; ’ jlllNtr ARY 1 'l6? i •?, •'/ (Befor^-^,.,Q, S,fcrod9,:Esg^., : B.M.), ij ; ! • . . Ahn Sherry, ah, idcorrigh b'e, was fined' Lo, br S^rn >leigh, ss, - or twehty J fbur' 1 hoars’; Honors Bradshaw, 5 s,or twenty four hours’; Francis Moonen, 6s, or twenty-four hour’s, | - ; ; r.r v .• I Moss y., Bielfieldv^^ / in,.this case, j udgtnent, in, which ’ iVA 8 , giy ea last; week, on theground of-dis-ooyery of fresh material evidence.,?jt/apr geared that; one Norm an.Wood,' who..stated -. v 'fh?n giving evidence ißjthe 'plain! tiff would be put to an expense of ,L25.,t0 repair the damage caused hy watef froth defendant’s premises, said to defendant after the case waa over that ho thought judgment would have been given againsfhim {Bielfield) for only about L 5. —His animadverted strongly 1 oh the coudfict of hmah whp could make such a .statement, after saying iri bis sworn’ evidence ■ that ; thecost' of‘"rej. pairs wou d be five times thaV aihounti had gone, into the box and doribidefeni 'daut- all i;he ; mischief j Ho corild? add‘ then sympathised with him afterwafdsVMr istewart thought Wood’s $> very extraordinary st itbrae]ntj‘ l ahd .‘that > ifc ; shp'Wed’ excessive damaged ’had 1 Heed given. J-Mr Stout opposed the application, and his Worship said that in -rillbases therij should uiohe should be opened rip again except under vriryktrong circuthatahces;. There Vas* really nothing to disturb the J jddgnieni’ already given in this,case, and the application would thereforp oe ' *>- 'v-vino i! 1 i • Aidrich'v. M^Glashah.—’Clhittf amounb'phid’ for repairs, as"per agfhemetit‘.— Mr J. Cook appeared for plaintiff, Mr Harris for defendant.—George Mingay Aldrich' plaintiff, said his late wife .rented the premises ■ from Mr ; Mhlhtfishi VMr- Mh'llashaii ‘being, bwher of the premises - as ’ faetbr f or the trualtees of one Sutton, : deceased.' 1 SbriaeVe-i "pairs became necessary in the'course of time, and witness got these done; meantime the property had passed, by marriage, into the hands pf a. Major, George, andfin 1 November 1873) a new* agreement 'was entered iutbV'ahd 1 atfejdahat ii dlspu6fed ! ‘]iai bdity.—Mr Harris briefly addressed the Court, and his Worship then gave judgment for defendant,.. . \ ■{Left sitting )

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18740116.2.10

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3402, 16 January 1874, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
344

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3402, 16 January 1874, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3402, 16 January 1874, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert