Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Wednesday, January 7.(Before A. C. Strode, Esq., R.M.) Moss v. ,Bielfa , eld.-rrAa application to be made by Mr Stewart for a re-hearing in this case, in which judgment was given in favor of the plaintiff on : Monday last, was adjourned, till Friday, as Mr Stout, plaintiff's counsel, was engaged in the Supreme Court . Keid v. Harris.—Claim 17s 6d,'for sunl dry seeds, &c.., supplied.—Mr Harris asked that judgment should be given without sosts, as he had not received notice of the account till the 17th December, aud immediately sent up h<s gardener to plaintiff's shop, but Mrs Keid refuaed to take the mon«y unless costs were...added, as,her : husband had taken out a" summons.—ln I answer to his Worship, plaintiff said that there was a little ill-feeling between him and defendant, the latter : having previously served him. in. the same ,way, and he was .only giving "tit for tat."—His Worship would not countenance any such proceedings If there were any rivalry between parties, a bourtof Justice was not the place to vei t their spleen ; the Court should only be used when amplication . had frequently been mide and payment refused, and he ! (his Worship) : considered that to deliver a bill and then forthwith to isteue a Bummons was rather sharp practice, and ho could,see there bad

been some underhand work in the matter. Mr Harris said he had been improperly brought before the Court.—Judgment was given for tbe amount, with coats. Geo. Forrester v. Joa. i?pcdding.—This a claim of L 4 8s for house rent. There was no appearause of the defendant.—Plain-* tiff stepped into the box, and 'id:answer>to bis Worship said that his wffej Who wasi-ntji’ present, bad served the ; summons.—Dik Worship replied that he could hot gei op without her, as there was no/affidavitservicb aud an adjournment of a quarter of an' hour was granted for her appearance.— On the Court resuming. Mrs Forres.er proved service, aud judgment was given by default for the amount claimed,,with costs.—Mrs Forrester i hen asked his Worship how she was to get defendant out of the place, and was advised to obtain legal advice, as she could not understand the law of landlord and tenant; and to get a man in aud to get him out was •a totally different thing, -

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18740107.2.13

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3394, 7 January 1874, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3394, 7 January 1874, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3394, 7 January 1874, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert