AN EXPLANATION.
To the Editor. §jp^ } —My attention has been drawn to a local in last night’s Star, in which it is represented that the case, “ Hunter v, Cargill,” was settled through the friendly interposition of myself. As it is inferred by many, from the tenor of your local, that St. Andrew’s Church went outside for a mediator, I wish to state that I was merely a member of a deputation appointed by the Deacon’s Court of the Church (of which I am a member) to settle the matter.—l am, &c., Keith Ramsay. Dunedin, Oct. 29, 1872.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18721029.2.13.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3024, 29 October 1872, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
97AN EXPLANATION. Evening Star, Issue 3024, 29 October 1872, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in