Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

This Day. (Before A. C. Strode, Esq., R.M.) Civil Cases. Dowse v. Harris.—Ll4 12s 6d, for saddlery supplied. Judgment by default for the plaintiff, with coats. Isaacs and Marks v. Mayo.—L4 6s 6d. This was a claim for L 3 6s, money paid to one Goldsmith by telegraphic request, and 10s Cd, the cost of several telegrams and postage of several letters. A claim of 10s for loss of time was struck out. Judgment for the plaintiffs by default, L 3 16s 6d and costs. Rumsey v. Treloar. —LI 3s 6d. The claim was acknowledged. Judgment by consent for the plaintiff—the amount to be paid in two months. Rumsey v. Jane Henderson.—l3s, for wood and coal supplied. The defendant admitted owing 8s Gd. Judgment for the plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs. Corsan v. Cowle.—Ll 10s, for hire of a buggy. From the evidence of the groom of the plaintiff, it appeared that the defendant went and inquired if a double buggy could be had, and was told that he could have one for 30s, which was agreed to, and the carriage was to be called for at two o’clock. The buggy and horses were ready, but were never called for. Judgment for the defendant. Mackenzie v. George Bayne.—Ll ss, for cattle trespass. The defendant admitted the trespass, but not the amount of damage. Judgment for the plaintiff, 20s, with costs. Strachan v. Edwin Sutherland. —L3 IGs 4d, for meat supplied. Judgment by default for the plaintiff for tbe amount, with costs. CHARGE OF ASSAULT, Thomas M. Hocken v. W. Jones.—On the case being called, Mr Harris, who appeared for the defendant, said that he believed some explanation * had taken place between the complainant and defendant, which rendered it unnecessary to proceed ■with the case. The case was accordingly dismissed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18720617.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 2910, 17 June 1872, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
304

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 2910, 17 June 1872, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 2910, 17 June 1872, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert