WATER WORKS COMPANY v. DR. CRAWFORD.
To the Editor. Sir, —In reply to Mr -William Begg’s letter in your Lsue of last evening, I beg to state that, allowing a medical practitioner of high standing in the profession” to have examined Dr. Crawford carefully on the 4th
inst., and to have expressed himself correctly on his then state of health and strength, this, I consider, is far from proving that the diagnosis I arrived at on the 27th ult. was incorrect. Seeing I was the only medical man consulted at the latter name of date, every other evidence which can appear must ho viewed as going for nothing. I trust to have done writing on this subject into which I have been very unwillingly and unjustly dragged. I am, Ac., Robert i'owie, Surgeon. Hove street, 7th December, 187b
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18711207.2.9.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume IX, Issue 2748, 7 December 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
138WATER WORKS COMPANY v. DR. CRAWFORD. Evening Star, Volume IX, Issue 2748, 7 December 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in