RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Tins Day, (Before.!. Fulton, Esq., R.M.) CII.VKCrB OF LIJBKL. Regha v. Buton—Mr Macasse}’ applied for a further remand in this case, ou the ground that an arrangement had been entered into between himself and the prosecutor for the Crown (Mr Haggitt) that it should not be proceeded with until the 23rd instant, and read a letter written in January to that effect, addressed to the Manager of the Daily Tium and Witoms Company. Mr Haggitt admitted the letter, but said that since that time he had received instructions from the Attorney-General,'directing him to press the charge, and stated that he had intimated the fact to Maeassey in ample time to enable him to subpamea witnesses and to proceed with the case then. After some further argument, Mr Haggitt expressed his willingness to allow a week’s further postponement, Mr Vaeassey pressing it on the ground of the original agreement. His Worship considcre I the terms of the letter conclusive as to the original understanding, and said that Mr strode had spoken to him incidentally to the same effect. A further remand of a week was granted.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18710216.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2497, 16 February 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
188RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2497, 16 February 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in