Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

This Day,

(Before A. 0. Strode, Esq., R.M.)

DRUNKENNESS. Colin M‘Donald, for this offence, was fined L 5, or in default, 14 days’ imprisonment.

Civil Cases.

Law, Somner, and Co. v. R. Westwood, was a claim for Ll3 I3s for goods supplied.— Judgment by default for the amount and costs.

J. P. Anquetil v. P. Allen, was a claim for L2, amount of an I, O. U. — Mr Wilson for the defendant. The parties had made an exchange of sets of harness. _ That belonging to the plaintiff was placed with Mr G. Dowse, Rattray street, f-r repair, but was destroyed by lire. Plaintiff now sought to recover toe am-amt of the 1.0. U. which had been given as part of the consideration in making the exchange.—’l he Ma<jiafcrato held that the bargain' had not been completed, and gave judgment for the defendant. Ell n Murdoch v. Catherine Mason, was a claim for 13s, value of a pane of glass alleg- d to h.ive been wilfully destroyed by the defendant. There was no proof, however, that it was she who b oke the glass, and the case was accordingly dismissed. Anthony Thomson v. Janies Hunter, was a claim for Ll 17 sd, for goods supplied to defendant’s wife. The defence was that the woman was not defendant’s wife ; that he merely boarded with her; and that he had never authorised her to contract any debts for him. A searching cro-s-examination by the Magistrate had the effect of eliciting that defendant had been cohabiting with the woman for about three years, and that she went by the name of Mrs Hunter. The Magistrate characterised the defence as a piece of rascality, and gave judgment for the amount claimed and costs.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18691029.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 2023, 29 October 1869, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
291

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 2023, 29 October 1869, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 2023, 29 October 1869, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert