Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

This Day, (Before James Fulton, Esq., R.M.) FIGHTING. John Taylor and Alfred Smith for fighting in the Princess Theatre were mulcted in the sums of 10s and 20s respectively. INFORMATIONS BY THE INSPECTOR OF NUISANCES. The following persons were fined the sums opposite their names, with costs, for allowing a nuisance to exist on their premises James Scanlan, 5s ; Scott and Josliug, 2s 6d; Thomson and Barclay, 2s 6d ; Alexandria Ferrear, 2s 6d ; John Donoghue, 2s (id; John M'David, 2s Gd ; Janies Bowie, 2s 6d ; John Cramond, Is ; Charles Tattam, Is ; Robert Bunn, for allowing filthy water to flow across a footpath from his premises, was fined 5s and costs ; Elizabeth Forrester for allowing a chimney (to get on fire, was discharged with a caution ; William Harrop, for removing the surface off Castle street, was fined 5s and costs j Joseph Strang, for

a similar offence in Walker street, was discharged with a caution ; Joseph Dickson, for a nuisance on his premises was discharged on condition that the place should be cleaned up immediately. Cunningham v. Barnes.—This case arose from the neighbors' squabble an account of which was given in the Evening Star yesterday. Mrs Cunningham, the suitor in the scuffle, but who had to pay for the honor, brought an action against Mrs Barnes to recover the value of a child’s hat, the destruction of which led to the quarrel. It was proved that she had destroyed the hat, and she was ordered to pay 10s, the value of it, and a 10s tine for the assault.

A mother’s quarrel,

Janet Lyel v. Mary Hunter.—Mrs Lyel and Mrs Hunter are neighbors, and have children, who play together. Mrs Lyel’s child offended Mrs Hunter, who beat her. Mrs Lyel, in reprisal, beat Mrs Hunter’s child. Mrs Hunter, in wrath, made forcible entry into Mrs Lyel’s house, seized her by the hair of her head, dragged her out, and scratched her face. The Magistrate concluded that both were to blame, and dismissed the case.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18690622.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 1912, 22 June 1869, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
336

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 1912, 22 June 1869, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 1912, 22 June 1869, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert