Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARSLOE'S EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE

LAMAS9N, ;M CLEAN, AND OTHEEB ALSO

DO WELL

Without making any brilliant array, the senior championship averages for Wellington cricket during the season just closed reveal many performances of merit. Generally, the bowling is shown up in better light than the batting, but all round there has been a very satisfactory return, considering the conditions which the players had to contend with during a season offering but little of real cricketing weather when it was most wanted. Disregarding those batsmen who had only a few innings, and those bowlers who did not take many wickets, a formidable list of main performers is presented. J. R. Lamason tops the batting average and is second in the aggregate. Next in average are Stevens and Blandford, and then comes°Parsloe, whose performance has been outstanding. Not only has Parsloe scored most runs, but he has also gained third place in the bowling averages. His all-round performance, together with his showing in the representative matches, would make it appear that Parsloe was one of the very unlucky players so far as the trip to England was concerned. At the head of the bowling averages is A. McLean, whose figures arc exceptionally good, and next to him is the Kilbirnie slow bowler, Allen, who, with Parsloe and Wilson (in the next two places), had much to do with Kilbirnie's success in the senior championship. McLean took most wickets, and next in aggregate is Blundell, who is consistently near the top season after season.

Among others werei—Lans (I.), 11.25 (four wickets); Ratfe (U.), 18.33 (six .wickets), Capstlck (H.), 20.7:! (11 wickets) ; Bice. (Kll.l, 21.16 (sir wickets) : Ell (W.). 22.T2 11 wickets); Duncan (O.B.), 26.50 (1(1 wickets), and Morgan (W.), 28.40 (10 wickets).

The figures for those batsmen who have had at least five innings for averages of over 25 and for bowlers ■who have taken more than .eleven wickets are:— BATTING. Inn. X.O. H.S. Buns. Avge. J. R. lamason (O.B.) 12 1 89 529 48.09 Stevens (U.) 9 « 33* 139 46.33 Blandford (U.) ..... 11 1 138 ,454 4;>.4O • Parsloe (Kll.) 13 - 143 562 43.23 l" (\VK . .... 12 2 "81 428 42.80 Gates (M) ... 8 2 72 241 40.18 WWha'm'W)' ... 13 - 'IIS 522 40.1= nice (Kll) 13 4 12S 4r)1 40-l)" folly <W .13 1 102 476 89.130 Capstlck (H.) 11 2-08 3 1 40. m Bush (O.B.) 6 2 51 133 3o.25 SSini.) ,J - J!» *»} 55-^2 Scott (I.) 12 1 . 68 3u4 o2.18 Lubransky (Kll.) ... 13 4 5.>* 28b .1... BRlnblrd (O.B.) .... 14 1 72 407 31.3 Biowne (O.B.) .... 14 2 71 Sil 30.91 Holllngs (Kar ) ..... 13 1 10C» 307 30.58 r, mT ,imi . ... 14- — • .8f. . .400 28.ji •Ohrtrtophmm (Kll.). 11 - S3 311 28.91 Wlren (U.) 11 1 ™ 28'2 28--° WltaW (Kil.) 13 2 80 309 S8.09 Belts (I.) 0 2 ,;•'* "» I'.-f. • Wilson. (U.) 12 1 137* 300 2..2, Chsevers (H.) 13 1 68 319 2C.H8 McCarthy (H.) : i....- T — 75... 18^. 26 42 Tlndlll (M.) 13 1 60» 316 26.33 Cults (Kar.) 12 1 102 288 26.18 . H. McLean (I.) 7 - 66 181 2 a .So •Xot out. Others included.—Wells (Kar.), 51.00 (one Innings) ; Handseomb (Kll.), 3o.00 (two innings, once nbt out); McMillan (U.), 21..J (10 Innings, twice not out) ; du Ch&tenu (O.B.). 24.54 (13 innings); Bezzant (M.), 24.3i (11 ' innlncs, three times'not out). BOWLING. 6. M. K. W. Aveo. A Mcloan "fl ) ... 226.6 56 406 43 11.23 lilen (Kll) ... 128.4 13 481 31 14.11 P«ilo..(KU.) .... 194.3 37 546 ; 37 14.75 Wilson.(Kll.) .... 96.3 18 298 20 14.00 Boyes (O.B.) .... 1G3 26 343 -23 14.81 Clark (II.) 88-4 ]0 25B IT 13-0'' TrlcKlebank (U.). .. 173.3 .23-. 556. 30 1S.H Blundell (W.) .... 27G.1 '72" 600 38 . 1..30 McMillan (U.) .... 121 17 302 20 18.10 Montgomery (I.) . 122 19 322 17 18 18 Griffiths (O.B.) ... 110.4 13 3,1 20 18.0. ■Rurke (I ) 73 0 274 14 19.01) ammpness (£)'.. 210 31 709. 37 l'J.lii Whvto (O.B.) 138 10 B27 27 19.51 Mallard (W 120.1 fl 501 25 20.10 Mclcnd (H) ... 90 15 281) 14 20.64 O'Neill (M).- 232 31 843 37 22.78 KlnB (K»r.) : 219 48 618 27 22.88 J. AshendPn (Kll.) 200.1 37 6j!2 28 .23.28 Tlnsq (H ) 120.5 8 489 21 23.-S Crawford (M) .... 146.2 20 540 22 24.51 HeidSSn (L) ... 134 16 403 U 23.06 K. McDonald (Kar.) 180 SI 5;o 22 2^1 a m \th (W 1 . 103 16 3.i7 14 2o.S0 S,( vV::: 1« i» 490 is 25.78 Mf Browne (Kar.) . 122 10 497 19 26.15 J. Lamason (O.B.) 129 21 350 13 27.38 Harour IV) . 328 20 431 15 28.1.1 wright (h.) .:::: 139 u 477 io 29.81 iandall <M.) Ill-* 15 398 12 33.16

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19370410.2.175.1

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue CXXIII, 10 April 1937, Page 23

Word Count
773

PARSLOE'S EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue CXXIII, 10 April 1937, Page 23

PARSLOE'S EXCELLENT PERFORMANCE Evening Post, Volume CXXIII, Issue CXXIII, 10 April 1937, Page 23

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert