Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A WIFE PROMISES NOT TO NAG

A remarkable marriage contract, in which a bride promised never to "nag" her husband, was read to the Kingston-on-Thames Bench recently, says the "Daily Telegraph."

Mrs. Diane Mary Cummings, 23, applied for a separation and maintenance order, on the grounds of persistent cruelty, against her husband, Sydney Edward Cummings.

Mr. Salter Nichols, for Mrs. Cummings, said that the couple were married in August, 1934. Four days before the wedding Cummings told his future wife that it would be necessary for her to sign the following document:— "I, Diane Mary Beard, undertake by marrying S. E. Cummings never to nag or annoy, or be suspipious of the said S. E. Cummings, and always to obey him. I also agree not to accept alimony or monetary consideration or property in the event of separation or divorce." ■

Mr. Nichols stated that any thwarting or displeasing of the husband had been me.t with cuffs and blows.

In a code of conduct which Cummings had laid down for his wife, he restricted her to four cigarettes per week, and refused to allow her to use lipstick.

Mrs. Cummings gave evidence that

her husband struck her on several occasions—once when she confessed that she had been using lipstick. Cross-examined by Mr. Compton Miller, Mrs. Cummings said that she was forced to sign the undertaking. "Why did you marry a man who was forcing you to sign a document?" asked Mr. Miller. Mrs. Cummings: I don't know. I loved him. . Cummings denied that he had been persistently cruel to his wife, and said that he had struck her on only three occasions and that, was with his open hand. Explaining the document, he said that his wife's parents objected to the marriage, and^added: — ■- . "My. wife told me that by. signing it she would prove to me that she was not marrying me for my money." Cummings declared that the document was mutually agreed on.: : Mr. Nichols: Did you give her an undertaking not to nag, annoy, or be | suspicious of her? Cummings: No, it was not necessary for me. It is not my way. A separation order was granted. Cummings was ordered to pay his wife £2 per week, and to nay £7 7s costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19360801.2.191.12

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Issue 28, 1 August 1936, Page 27

Word Count
374

A WIFE PROMISES NOT TO NAG Evening Post, Issue 28, 1 August 1936, Page 27

A WIFE PROMISES NOT TO NAG Evening Post, Issue 28, 1 August 1936, Page 27

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert