COUNCIL WAGES
. Through an error in an article, "Council Wages," in Saturday's "Post," it was made to appear that Councillor Eraser had moved the resolution, in July^ 1931, which resulted in married men in, receipt of £4 per week and less being exempted from a wages cut. This motion was moved by Councillor T. "Forsyth, not by Councillor Fraser. Bef erring to the maater today, Councillor Frascr said that obviously ho could not have moved such a motion as he was riot at that time a member of the council. He also asked that it should be made clear that Councillor W. Duncan had. voted in favour of a 10 per cent, restoration of wages to those receiving £250 and under per annum rather than for a 2 per cent, reduction of Tates.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340507.2.105
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 106, 7 May 1934, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
133COUNCIL WAGES Evening Post, Volume CXVII, Issue 106, 7 May 1934, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in