Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DUTY ON CHEWING GUM

That the retail price of Brltisi ebewing gnm could not remain at Id 'if the duty: were raised, was stated before the Tariff Cpmmissiori yesterday. .Messrs. . Toop and Nielson, representing a company subsidiary to Rountreos, of York, England, said that the position in regard to their confections had altered. ' Tho Australian--fariff. was still; 2d per.lb, and they asked that the rate on the British goods should not-be more , than. 2d. Costs had come down to meet "present marketing conditions. If the duty were more than 2d, they could not make sales of penny-chewing gum in Now Zealand;: .-■■-- - ■ -1-

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19331028.2.160

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 103, 28 October 1933, Page 16

Word count
Tapeke kupu
102

DUTY ON CHEWING GUM Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 103, 28 October 1933, Page 16

DUTY ON CHEWING GUM Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 103, 28 October 1933, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert