Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRESENT WEAKNESS

BRITISH NAVY AS A WHOCB

LORD JELLICOE CONOERNEDf

LONDON, SepteunTjer 27. ■ Lord Jellicoo in an interview, saiil that whilo he was pleased .vjjfc' Anrtia* lia's defence proposals, they, 'meant /n« increase in Australia's moxjest naval strength, but simply restored that; strength to effectiveness. H#t was much concerned over the presei^r weakness of the British Navy as a whole.

Lord Jellicoe regretted the. Australian; proposal to uiako a destcoiyer flotilla! one leader and four destroyers instead of eight, which was a properly; constituted flotilla fully qualified toi carry out training exercises in. this branch of the service.

Britain and Germany-r-the' latter under compulsion—had rejdnced their; navies, but all the other ujaval Powers' had increased theirs, or.i^t least iad maintained wartime strength. •'<■■■■■

"Since we had not enough cruisev* and destroyers to convoy our merchantmen in war, what would Vie the position; today?" asked Lord Jeflieoe. ."The stoppage of bur sea-borno traffic would entail tho Empire's mini." Lord Jellicoe added tjiafc Jiis reporti asked for by the ConprionweaJth in; 1919 had been ruled out by the "Washr ington decisions of 1921..

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330928.2.112.5

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 77, 28 September 1933, Page 11

Word Count
180

PRESENT WEAKNESS Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 77, 28 September 1933, Page 11

PRESENT WEAKNESS Evening Post, Volume CXVI, Issue 77, 28 September 1933, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert