Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

"GOING TOO FAR?"

MACHINERY INSPECTIONS

AUCKLAND OPINIONS

There is some difference of opinion in Auckland with regard to the fees charged for machinery inspections made by the Marine Department. In Wellington and Christchurch opinion is that the Department is "going too far, and, in the effort to be selfsupporting, is "carrying inspections to extremes."

The head of one large engineering department, who has had 2§ years' experience, said that, he thought the inspections were absolutely necessary (states the "Auckland Star"). The inspectors had always performed their duties faithfully, and their inspections were a safeguard to the public, employer, and employee alike. He had not met a single inspector who did not know his job thoroughly. The inspectors sent around by the Department wero highly capable men with years o± marine experience behind them. The manager of the Auckland Power Board said that the matter had been considered by the board some years ago, whoa it was decided that the department's inspections were superfluous and a duplication, more or less, o± then- own inspections of their maehmory. The board was of the opinion that the charges made by the Department were not equitable. To charge a fee for every little motor installed was ridiculous. The whole inspection could be carried out by the factory inspectors. The superintending engineer at the -banners' Freezing Company was of the opinion that the fees charged by the -Department were not too high, although they wero in most <jases double the rates obtaining two years ago, when they wero undoubtedly too low "The inspection of 'machinery is a good thing for everyone concerned," he said. I his particularly applies to boilers." A boiler could burst, and while not harming anyone inside the factory could injure pedestrians outside. Inspections were made once a year in the ease of boilers ana electric motors, but m the case of electric lifts, which had only recently been brought under the machinery inspection regulations, inspection twice a year was quite unnecessary.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330328.2.184

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 73, 28 March 1933, Page 13

Word Count
330

"GOING TOO FAR?" Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 73, 28 March 1933, Page 13

"GOING TOO FAR?" Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 73, 28 March 1933, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert