Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARMERS' PLIGHT

ARTIFICIAL EXCHANGE

DEBATE IN COUNCIL

The Government's high exchange policy was again discussed in the Legislative Council yesterday afternoon ■when the debate on the second reading of the Banks Indemnity (Exchange) Bill was continued. The adjournment was moved by^ the Bight Hon. Sir Francis Bell, who will cuter, the lists today.

, The.Hon. B. McCallum said that he Bupported the Bill wholeheartedly. It was a pity that.the measure had not been brought in eighteen months ago by instalments. The people who. earned the country's living were the farmers, and,the public did-not seem to, realise the dire plight of the primary producers. If it were realised there would be less academic discussion. "I support the Government's policy," said Mr. McCallum, "because-it is the policy 6t the Bank of New South "WaleSj that great bank -which carried Australia for many years." Because of the strong opposition. of the towns, the chambers of commerce, etc., he was heartily in favour of the Government's action. They had the assurance of the Minister of Finance (the Eight Hon. J. Gr. Coates) that the raising of. the exchange was not a breach of the Ottawa Agreement. The Leader of the Council (the Hon. Sir James Parr): England doesn't want to bankrupt the farmers. ■-.'•• _ .'Mr. McCallum said it was time that it was recognised that .the body politic - was one. The Hon. W.Snodgrass said that the spirit of reasonableness and co-opera-tion was very essential at the present time. Had-this feeling been prevalent there would have been little opposition to the; Government's action. There was no question:that the Ministry considered'that the raising of the exchange was a good thing for ■ the country. There Was no doubt that they had acted honestly. The Hon. M. Fagan: No one has suggested anything" else. . :'•:■• Mr. Snodgrass said that had the increased exchange been put into operation before the wage reductions it might not have been necessary to impose the cuts. The increased exchange- would have put more money into circulation, i

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330210.2.41

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 34, 10 February 1933, Page 5

Word Count
331

FARMERS' PLIGHT Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 34, 10 February 1933, Page 5

FARMERS' PLIGHT Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 34, 10 February 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert