Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STRUCK THE EARTH

A GIANT COMET

AN AMERICAN DISCOVERY

ENORMOUS SCABS

An array of evidence,- which, in- the light of present knowledge, can be "best explained on the hypothesis that the earth haa been in.collision with a giant comet, more than' a third larger thaa Halley's Comet, between 100,000 and 1,000,000 years ago,, was presented before the annual winter meeting of. the American Association forth© Advancement of Science (says the "New-Tork Times"). , :.- . . This prehistoric epic was deciphered recently ■by Dr. >. A.' Melton,-Asso-ciate Professor of , Geology,, arid Dr. William Schriever,- ' .Professor "■' of Physics, both' of the. Pniversity "of Oklahoma, from a number of-gigantic holes in the ■ ground-in: the- Carolina's, known^as:"bays;" some of theinrriore thau 8000 feet long. - The-depressions were first observed "by- Professor Melton through.an aeroplane mosaic map made by him in 1930'0f 500' square miles in Horry County, S.C. . -.! By comparing. the ; enormous • scars in the ground and the. wide .territory they cover with the : known dents made by meteors, such as the Meteor Crater of Arizona, the huge ■ meteor that fell in Siberia in 1908,. and other known meteor craters, Dry Melton and Dr. Schriever. reaspn that the depressions in the ground in.-South Carolina could be explained only on the hypotheses that a comet.about 400 miles in diameter came- in violent collision with -the earth and was smashed to pieces after•'•: devastating an area that- would cover thirteen-of the largest Eastern- States—about 190,000 square miles. . The evidence further shows, that it 'was.'all over in a .minute or so. /' ;..' ■■" . WHAT.THE MAP. SHO^rSl, - • The aerial mosaic ;map, the scientists say, revealed numerous large,' smoothly elliptical depressions, averaging approximately half a .mile in' length. ■-Field trips during June, .1931, .and August, 1932, together with-studies^ o£-many aerial photographs .of." the-' Atlantic coastal plain, yielded the.;following, facts:—: ..., ' . . > ' ■ The region- of' occurrence ' is' the Atlantic Coastal. plain'between-Norfolkj Virginia; 'and the ■' Savannah Kiyer,, an area of. approximately 40,000' square miles.- •-..■■-'". -■■:.,.-; .''.;■[■.:■" ■ The individual depressions areismoothly elliptical in shape. : .'.-':- " " -: The long axes of all the-depressions thus seen -are ■ parallel ';>ndrtli-wcst-southeast lines. ■';'■:... Elevated rims • completely-- encircle some of -the depressions. .' • •An elevated.rim is invariably", higher at the south-eastern end. •: ; - .■-■•• There is a general 'increase [>■. of elliptieity with size. .. • ... ■ • "■'.■- Double and. triple■"concßntric"vrims. exist. .-; . ,;.i-".;._ :-JC'.'.'■'-' ■■ The depressions intersect-each nther; completeness of outline is maintained sometimes by the' larger and sometimes by the smaller. ■• ■■ ■ . These depressions are at least as old as the Pamlico: Terrace of. the late Pleistocene age and younger than the' Waccamaw formation of- the'Pilocene age. . . ■' . . .".;... All known geological processes -were considered carefully, but not', any of them, either, alone, or in. combination, could be made to explain.- satisfactorily these peculiar and striking-depressions, Dr. Melton arid Dr. Schrieye'r declate. The. impact of' a'shower-of meteors on the coastal plain '■ is suggested 'as the agent which caused * these depressions or scar's,'which are locally termed "bays,".they add. A'globular cluster of meteorites-ira.. comet—at least 400 miles in diameter approaching the region from the north-west' along a path inclined:to.the;horizontal,-"could have, produced■ the-scars^which,;at r .the present time, number 'more -than i-1500—

probably more than 3000 if-s'fflaileT .flneg are, included." ,- COULD HAVE DONE IT. "Such a globular cluster ofjneteorites," the scientists-sard, ""would produce- impact scars over, an elliptical area- of .400 miles" wide.'northeast-south. west, by 630 miles long, northwestsoutheast— au area "of 190^000 .jsqnare miles. Of this area only 40,000 square miles lie on the coastal plain; the remaining 150,000 square miles lie in the Atlantic Ocean, on the piedmont upland and in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. -There the relatively rapid erosion has probably completely erased the surface features of the scars since the supposed... impacts.. occurred—an interval.of time which may have .been more than a million years in length. "Although a meteorite enters tha earth's atmosphere with a velocity of the order of twenty-five miles per second, ,so much of its energy is absorbed while penetrating.-the atmosphere that even a large meteorite strikes the earth with a velocity of probably only half a dozen miles per'second. A shower of these- super-high : speed.-projectiles, such as might compose: the-nucleus-of a comet,: striking the surf ace -'of: the earth at an angle, would! produced a group of parallel elliptical splashes'such as are. to be observed in the Carolinas. ' If the meteorites approach, the earth from the north-west,, more" material would be splashed out. toward- the south-east, v and, as a result, the 'rima would .be largest on the south-eastern ends of the sears. This relationship in rim-size is clearly the case with the Carolina scars. ' • .. • . •. .. !_■. . "Since it would require a minute or more for a globular cluster, of meteorites 400 miles in diameter to strike the earth, a scar formed by one*of the bodies which struck first might be .partly obliterated. It would be expected that a largo scar might partially obscure a small one, and that a small one might intersect a large one, or even' that a small one might exist completely inside the. edge of a very large; one. Examples of all such cases are to b* seen in the Carolinas. ' 'The largest single impact-scar...of which an aerial photograph was available is more than 8000 ft long. However, the length of: this*scar is probably due to.its being a comlination of two impact-scars of which one was nearly • 7000 ft. long. Many' others nearly- two' miles in length are known be* yond the area photographed. ."•: NUCLEUS OF COMET. : . •-"If a shower of such size would not* strike frpm' the north-east or southwest :in- the North-Eastern .United States, the scarred area alone -would cover all the States of New York, Pennsylvania, 'Massachusetts, Connecticut, Bhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and large parts of "Vermont, New Hampshire, Virginia, West Virginia, and Ohio; and in addition, half of Lake. Ontario and a-considerable area of" cpastaf-waters. :'; ' * "Observations made ■on Halley's Comet on its last visit in 19.10 indi.cated to the- astronomers- that,■ the diameter of its nucleus, was less than: ■ ■290 miles. "When the nueleiis of- this comet passed • between the sun and an. observer, it is reported that the 6bserver, using a 6in telescope, was able to see small sun-spots through, the nucleus of the comet without seeing any, trace of the nucleus itself. tions ,of this type ,have~ foreedr competent astronomers to the conclusion! that the nucleus of a comet is-composed of fragments and that it is-not one solid- mass. Some competent: astronomers are of the opinion that. Meteor jCrater,.Arizona, and the Siberian scars are the Tesul^s of the impacts.of the nuclei of tiny comets. If the impact scars in the "Carolinas were caused by a globular cluster of meteorites, 7 ifc seems Tery reasonable -to .suppose -that ' the cluster "was the nucleus Gf'.avcomefc much larger than the : fam6us: "Halley's' Comet. . ■ "That the elliptical: aepre'ssions ■ia the. Carolinas were caused by-meteor-ites, or the nucleus of a comet, is of course a hypothesis, but, the observed - facts seem to permit of no other, interpretation." . ; . In Greyfriars Churchyard, * Edinburgh, within fifty yards of the . entrance, are tombstones of date 1610, 1612, 1614, 1615, 1617, .1632..•;.-. The. tombstones are, fairly, large, ones. : ' '....-...

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330208.2.14

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 32, 8 February 1933, Page 3

Word Count
1,162

STRUCK THE EARTH Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 32, 8 February 1933, Page 3

STRUCK THE EARTH Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 32, 8 February 1933, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert