Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HORSES BEHAVIOUR

SUPREME COURT ACTION

Further evidence about the habits of a horse which bolted on a Te Horo farm and upset a spring. cart was heard in the Supreme Court yesterday afternoon and to-day at the hearing of the action, for damages brought by.Beuben Oscar Knight, aged 15, through his father, against a farmer, Bupert Henry Knight. As a result of the accident, Keuben Knight's right thigh was fractured, and he suffered other injuries. He claimed 65 weeks' wages, totalling £•165, hospital and medical expenses, and £300 general damages.

At the conclusion of the evidence and after hearing the impressions of counsel (Mr. "P. J. O'B-egan "for the plaintiff and Mr. W. E. Leicester for the defendant), the Chief Justice (Sir Michael Myers) reserved his decision.

A number of Te Horo residents, called as witnesses by the plaintiff, said that they did not regard the- horse as suitable for any purpose other than ploughing. One-of the witnesses. Leslie Burton. Styles, said that after the accident the horse was sent to Manakau. It was now back on Mr. Knight's farm, and was in poor condition.

* Mr. Leicester: Perhaps it is grieving over the accident.

George Burton Styles, another witness for the plaintiff, admitted that he had offered to buy the horse after the accident with a view to disposing of it to a Lower Hutt carrier and making some money on the sale. The horse was high-spirited, and might be called by some people "mad-headed/ but Ms •sriew was that it would be all right if given constant work. The carrier he had in mind as a prospective buyer would have found suitable work for the horse, which would have made it safe.

" It was admitted by the defence that at other times the horse had bolted from a standing position, but not, until the accident, while it was being driven by the defendant. The evidence was that the horse was.in no way unsafe to drive in a spring cart, and that the defendant had no reason to believe that it was unsafe to drive.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19321123.2.90

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 125, 23 November 1932, Page 9

Word Count
345

HORSES BEHAVIOUR Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 125, 23 November 1932, Page 9

HORSES BEHAVIOUR Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 125, 23 November 1932, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert