Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VALUE OF KINDERGARTEN WORK

(To the Editor.)

Sir,—The announcement that thefGovernmenfc subsidy to kindergartens is to cease this year is a shock to those good citizens who founded and maintained them' for years until their value to the com-1 munity became more widely acknowledged. It is agreed that the youngsters who attend kindergartens are at a most receptive age to absorb the principles of manners and discipline, tidiness and observation, responsibility and helpfulness that are there inlaid never to quite disappear. Primary school teachers seem unanimously o£ opinion that scholars coming to them from years at kindergarten schools are noticeably better prepared for , ordinary schooling than children*who have not had such opportunities. ' ' # ' That retrenchment is necessary in' most branches of public expenditure is increasingly clear to anyone who will study our national incomings and outgoings. We shall have to go without a number of things we have enjoyed if we are to remain solvent. But it seems rational to review the whole position before such 100 per cent, cuts are made, so that a wise sense of proportion may govern the needed retrenchment. For several years N*w Zealanders have shown their approval 01 the kindergarten work done, by' Bub6crib-: ing £5000 annually, which the Government! has subsidised £ for £. The 100 per cent; cut proposed will save £5000 and badlycripple valuable work., One per ( cent, cut on education as a. whole would save more than £30,000. I suggest that we get equal-value from our past expenditure on kindergartens as as we do from any department of education, and that there is no good reason for more than a 50 per cent, cut, until. other form's of education have contribut-1 ed 'an approximate share ■to the general and necessary saving which our .-educed national income demands. Parliament, on! due consideration, will, I fed sure; decline I to be a> party to such a sweeping away i of the good work done by the kindergar-1 tens in admirable training of its future citizens.—l am, etc., ■• ,

SWILE B^MATHESON.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19320204.2.59

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 29, 4 February 1932, Page 10

Word Count
334

VALUE OF KINDERGARTEN WORK Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 29, 4 February 1932, Page 10

VALUE OF KINDERGARTEN WORK Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 29, 4 February 1932, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert