Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

QUESTION OF LIBERTY

MARRIED WOMEN TEACHERS

A keen, del>ate took place recently at a meeting of the Public School Teachers* lederation of New South I Wales, on the subject of the dismissal of married women' teachers in order to make- room for the newly passed students, from tha Training Colleges.

A proposal was brought, forward from tha Wagga branch in favour of dispensing with the services of married women teachers. The proposer said that the training schools wore- turning out 1500 students, for whom there were only 320 places, and the remedy suggested for this was that married women teachers should bs dismissed from the service to maka room. He was of opinion that people should not, in. these days, hold two jobs, and the women already had -work in their homes., The question asked, if ho thought that no person (man or woman) should hold ttro jobs,, did not appear to ekeit any reply. Mr. Bidtev said he thought the proposal was. a deliberate attempt at repudiation and bxeaeh. of contract. "If this is liberty ia Australia, 1' he remarked, "where we boast of our freedom, than give m« Sussia."' Dr. Currey, in proposing an amendment to the effect that tha resolution regarding mamed ■women should be deleted, said: "Why single oat married women teachers* (Why. notj pole-axe |tho college staff aud headmasters to make room for others?'* "Wltw helped in. chemist's shops, vs. resUtaants, and in many business houses. Oaeft they abandoned a fixed principle they were on shifting sand. Having any regard fox- Britisk justice, the Khoto argument was against the proposal. ,' I Another speaker said that ho 'knew lof ao ground on. ■which the conference could admit the necessity of dismissing [anybody, A woman teaeker elsimed the right fox a woman to direct her owm destiny; The proposal was distiftetfr of a class natara, Did they intend to diserimiaate agatnsfe married women teaehera only, or were all married women, employed to be brought into ojtestio** , 1 , ~ - It was deeded! ttiitttta/awtkn was an attack* oa their >wa and could no,t be, sapportedfby the^federation. vDr. CwreyV^a.i«a3meaV> was carried, I, ■'!, -< „' t tf\

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19320109.2.20

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1932, Page 6

Word Count
353

QUESTION OF LIBERTY Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1932, Page 6

QUESTION OF LIBERTY Evening Post, Volume CXIII, Issue 7, 9 January 1932, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert