Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UPPER HOUSE CASE

COMMENT BY "OBSERVER"

LONDON, 27th December. ' Tlic "Observer," referring to the New South Wales Upper House decision, says that the Supreme Court ruling seems sound. It points out that the New South Wales Parliament owes its existence to an Act passed by the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and asks how New South AVales can amend it.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19301229.2.71

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 154, 29 December 1930, Page 9

Word Count
60

UPPER HOUSE CASE Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 154, 29 December 1930, Page 9

UPPER HOUSE CASE Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 154, 29 December 1930, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert