Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOW DURABLE ?

TAR-SEALED ROADS

LOANS BOARD CRITICISED

The following report of the Finance Committee on the proposed £65,000 loan was before the Lower Hutt Borough Council last evening:— I '' The committee has to report that the%Loans Board has given its sanction to the taking of the poll in connection with the proposed loan. The board has approved of the raising of £30,000 for a period of seven years, and the balance of £35,000 for a period of thirty years, and was not prepared to equate the terms for the ■ whole of the. loan owing to the wide disparity in the estimated 'life' of the scaling work, as compared with the remainder of the work included in the schedule. The board also requires the establishment of a sinking fund of not less thaii £12 5s - per cent, per annum in connection witjh the- £30,000 portion of the loan. This, with the payment of interest at the, rate of 5$ per cent., would mean that this portion of the loan would be costing the ratepayers 18 per cent, per annum during its life. The committee " does not, at this stage, feel " that it can recommend the council to proceed with the loan poll, and has arranged for the Mayor to confer with the Public Works Department, and, if necessary, the Loans Board, in an endeavour to arrive at terms more suitable to the council." Councillors agreed with the Mayor that the refusal of the Loans Board to give the tar-sealed streets a life of more than seven years was most unsatisfactory. Similar streets in the borough laid down four years ago were in a better condition to-day than when first laid down. Councillor Grierson pointed out that it was the policy of the council to maintain the streets out of revenue by coating them every second year, and' this should be taken into consideration. The opinion was expressed by councillors that the life of these streets was at least fifteen years, and it would be useless to go to the ratepayers unless the Loans Board would make the period of the loan at the very least twelve years.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19300430.2.118

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 100, 30 April 1930, Page 13

Word Count
356

HOW DURABLE ? Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 100, 30 April 1930, Page 13

HOW DURABLE ? Evening Post, Volume CIX, Issue 100, 30 April 1930, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert