Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ERROR IN A WILL

REGARDING A* CHARITABLE ' BEQUEST.

<« TELEGRAPH.—PRESS ASSOCIATION,)

AUCKLAND, 2nd June. It occasionally happens that charitable bequests are made to institutions which either' do not exist or are wrongly described in testators' wills. One such case cropped up at the Supreme Court to-day. It concerned the bequest of about £1000, made by an old lady to a church in England, which she had attended many years ago. The application was heard by Mr. Justice Stringer. The plaintiffs were the trustees under the will of the late Mrs. Mary Ann Jackson, of Auckland, widow, and the defendant was the Rev. Arthur Sincker, vicar of St. C4eorge's Church, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Staffordshire, England. The testator, by her-will, left the whole of her estate, amounting to about £1000, to the senior clergyman of the Church of England, officiating at "St. Mary's Church, Newcastle-under-Lyme," the money to be used for repairs or additions to the church. Inquiries were made by the trustees, and it was found that' there was no church called St. Mary's at Newcastle-under-Lyme, the two churches of the Church of England there being named St. George's and St. Giles. The Court was, therefore, called upon to decide the question to whom the money should be paid. Affidavits made in England were put in, showing that many years ago, before she left England, the testator regularly attended St. George's Church, and that the vicar of St.' Giles's was making no claim to the money. On behalf of the plaintiff, it was submitted that the bequest, being a charitable one, evidence was admissible to show which church the testator intended to receive the money, and that even if it were not admitted and the Court applied the "cy pres" doctrine, dividing the money between the two churches in the town, the fact that one church had disclaimed the be.quest would mean that St. George's would get the money. Mr. Justice Stringer concurred with the, views expressed, and ordered the estate to be handed over to the defendant, the costs to be paid out of the estate.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19190603.2.41

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume XCVII, Issue 128, 3 June 1919, Page 4

Word Count
343

ERROR IN A WILL Evening Post, Volume XCVII, Issue 128, 3 June 1919, Page 4

ERROR IN A WILL Evening Post, Volume XCVII, Issue 128, 3 June 1919, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert