GREATER J. D. WILLIAMS COMPANY
CHARGE AGAINST, MR. WILMAMS WITHDRAWN. By Telegraph.— Press Association.— Copyright. SYDNEY, llth February. , When the charge against James Dixon Williams, manager of the Greater J, D. Williams Amusement Company, of abetting ,tha forgery of a share order W£a called to-day, ' Counsel. for the pr execution announced that he arid the counsel for the defence had gone thoroughly into the case on account of the public' matters involved, and agreed that Williams, in taking the step he did, had acted bona fide and in the interests of the shareholder^, and he thought the explanation put before hun by counsel convinced him that the proper course to pursue in thd interests of the shareholders -was not to proceed further with the clAige. ' ' Counsel for the defence stated that Williams ,asgented to this course, Tealising it was in the interests of the company and the shareholders. He Was also of opinion that the quarrel should cease between the parties as the, explanation given was satisfactory, and' williams should be honourably discharged. The charge was thereupon withdrawn, and Williams was discharged.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19130212.2.11
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXXV, Issue 36, 12 February 1913, Page 2
Word Count
182GREATER J. D. WILLIAMS COMPANY Evening Post, Volume LXXXV, Issue 36, 12 February 1913, Page 2
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in