Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT This Day.

(Before C. D. R. Ward, Esq., R.M.) Henry Chap pel I was fined 20s for breach of Constabulary Force Ordinance. James Brady, James Phillis, and Thomas Griffiths, were each fined 10s lor drunken* nees. W. W. Taylor v. Thomas Hawke, debt J628 11s 9d— judgment for amount and costs. Whisker v. J. E. Bannister, debt £17 10s 9d— judgment for amount and costs. R. Greenfield v. J. E. Bannister, debt £2 5s lOd— judgment for amount with costs Same v. W. Bannister, dtbt £38 8s Bd— judgment for amount and costs. Phelan v. Orr, debt JB3 5s 7d— judgment for amount and costs. Same v. Hebberley, debt j£9 7s 2d — judgment for amount and costs.' Judpe v. Morgan— judgment for 9s 6d, the plaintiff to pay costs. Phelan v. Emilia Gobbey— plaintiff non-. suited.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18651120.2.7

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Issue 245, 20 November 1865, Page 2

Word Count
139

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT This Day. Evening Post, Issue 245, 20 November 1865, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT This Day. Evening Post, Issue 245, 20 November 1865, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert