Page 1 Advertisements Column 6

Ellesmere Guardian, Volume X, Issue 903, 2 May 1891, Page 1

are jnclihfed td'lie lively, but the liveli** 1 hi I •■.{: ..jjfiri.ririj ijt ipTisiai <ji)dl7 i inesß tthejj.mdjulgi? i^ is.flflft.pf pffipp on a , 'railway; station-. 1 '^mtv^df' 1 tn6B(y- dark - ■! -i'/-i -if >: .:• :■• ■r/.n , 'if : ; ;|i rey^mngs there wiljtibe a ; accident. v "aniJ "'theri' a»'f'e'f6f ra 'will I be 1 instituted . rfenld' it -not' fie better to institute the . reform ; at once, byt not,. sending ; children of tender 1 years io '■' the } statidrf *at all , and so preventing the accident, Arhicb, . under Me! preapnl sysfonf, Ms almost inevitable. «.!V.A • That k-a wonderful jarn r the Times >^^V^lujr VhSb lOiittles Riyer tragedy. i Because two -unknown- men Jh^ard an uhtueircineu renrani.^al - some undefined date that he had^slain a Fin- ' therefore , Nils JacobseMis not * guilty of the ! murdejr, of % Swe^ na^ned Mats Johans • sen.' ft will' take a good many "official . dOraMeiftSr^pf;H|b] jtapi to convince the MinitsteF-iieF Justice and the public ' 163 tUd^q'j^sfnels oli3icQ'Bs9ti'3 senI tence, T/VfJ R W Home tysl®i .-though rather late m the day. <$frf %JWcMFathers have awakened •i (tojta|^elief that since they handle the money received for license fees, they J shouiaOiaSref^'biglsa^in the granting of l mf l^ : im g to give , . the. SputhiiridgefolkjA; real l^ye-Xicens- ■ ing Commifctee'of.fcheitoSrnJ^ltcertain* ly does 'seem' M a' / tnfle (l[ outrßgeous that people living, miles from Southbridge, possibly never even setting foot on its ;-. atony- footpaths,) ' Should have :-the power 1 ! of granting or f r6fusirig licenses 1 to the , hotels of the town. If there are to be 1 no hotels, we must "learn to do without , 'em," but wel don't propose to close I $$em ul|le|s $ m>jorj^ of^Hose meat I interested declare it necessary. „ lomiAiY-* A ;l.i} f f«J;-! ;.'/.;■?• : )!;-■> T^Eji determination, xji^beiTciWli-Board created a . little, flutter m the district y^ew:,. thg B^rd n ( p^,o^ljr. refrained from voting tbemseLvSß, o but( .endeavoured to persuade otherratepayers also to abstain They held ,tha|; , voting might hereafter : prejudice their right to their own Com- >, mittee, Ani some of- the candidates , did not like' this rigid hbAiihterference. ' ' Their 'argumenfe was^that lefr^outhbridge vote , or , not •, a . . Qora.mifctee woul d be elected . It was therefore the duty of ' Sbuthbridge to ; H^P't^PW- belt men.' ■ TKeh let the q"uesti6n""6f~ar separate committee come SouTkßfe/i>4K; v however _ has argued ,', Ini ih^^ftst it v^tei, not for • < ah' E llesmero < District -Licensing ComI," 'p^i^e^/^uV'f^r-fivyToyfa'', 3Q^r^".|District ■ 'Committee, which m constitution was iSentieal 7 with the former ' -body. If . therefore, tlieynow vote 4. for the Ellesmere Candidates, they were, m effeot , voting-^? 1 their ! 'dife'''Cd'mttiittee, and haying done that, could not ask for a separate^ Coirimiifee/oftheir own. Hence they abstaine.d>fr9m voting at all. But . unfortunately,; it* this was tio prejudice their claim, the;ol^ini^ '^a)a alje'ady prejudicedy'f6r< all 'the 'ratepayers did not abstain from yoting^.. Altogether, it is a<6fe&yi'Jfcttfelog dskt ! l U '(4- 1 .^Appi 1 ; p£ -f Qiie / of ,;^ LJUesniere families) went to Melbourne, fell among^. thieves the moment he ) i^padiyshdi^ATlvelSffdalvKliy frien Ily , gentleman was on hand, ready to do anything iofAfhe stranger m a foreign ' : rana f 'eyeKlßWdin^ } hrni f^ O billet "on his father's r,un.fi new artivai : was'Wt altogether favourably itripresse.d byi-the friendly and gushing ' Victbrian/anlthe timely arrival of a " ra'ithbar «^ tHe! foorcn " prevented any ■ dhtna^6<to person or, jjSropeiEiyk Unless ITT r "9n^jj. J .ftjgn^ j r^ .^t}^ employs :^w''U'Si;'»ii^^i'OK;:!,yu^ridtJici;>t ' :. ■-' i ( ihe >|^^f|^^ltj».jQ.^niu < fetfa dou