RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
September 23, 1873. (Before W. L. Simpson, Esq., R.M.) Schubert v. Richards.—Claim, 7/., for medical assistance. Case dismissed—the Plaintiff not being a duly qualified medical practitioner, nor registered under the Act. The Magistrate in his remarks drew the attention of the S-'ggeant of Police to the case. Smith v. Ayling. Claim, amount, the prime cost of a chaff-cutting machine. The particulars of the case appear to be as follows—Defendant borrows a chaff-cutting machine, and while using the tame, breaks it ;he has it repaired at his own cost, and desires to return it. Plaintiff refuses to take back the machine, and demands the original cost. There being no evidence brought forward as to theeslimatodamount of damages, or to what extent the machine was deteriorated, the case was adjourned till the next sitting of the Court, October the 21st,, for the production of witnesses.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST18730926.2.15
Bibliographic details
Dunstan Times, Issue 597, 26 September 1873, Page 3
Word Count
146RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Dunstan Times, Issue 597, 26 September 1873, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in