Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TICHBORNE TRIAL.

The tiial’of the Tichborne Claimant, on charges for forgery, and for perjury, commenced on Wednesday, in thoj'X'ourt of Court of Queen’s Bauch, before the Lord Chief Justice Cookburn, Mr. Justice Mcllor, and Sir. Justice Lush. j. There arc two counts in the indictment, which is for par- ! jury only, and relate to the evidence which j ho gave in the civil trial and in Clio afhda--1 vita made in the Chancery suit with which he initiated his claim. The other indict- | incut is for forgery, which the counsel for j the Crown will sock to prove by means of I the signature E. C. D. Tichbourne, attached I to the Tichbourne bonds. It is well known j that a difficulty lias arisen about the order i in which those indictments are to bo taken. Naturally, and in the ordinary 'course, the indictments for forgery, which ia a Colony, would bo taken before th it for perjury. Such, too, is the order in which prisoner desired to have the’charges taken ; [but the counsel for the Crown have thought proper to change the order, and to try in the lirot place theindictmeuts forporjury. The issues in all arc practically the same, and wo do not imagine that the prisoner will bo seriously prejudiced by the course pursued, which may even turn out advantageously for the Claimant. But, so far as the jury ia concerned, the difference in effect in more material. In a trial for felony, the jury may bo locked up every night until the trial terminates ; and, as the Lord Chief Justice observed, it might happen that the unfortunate jury might he locked up for three months. It will bo tho business of the proseui'ion to prove that the Claimant is not E. C. h>. Tichborns ; and, in order to substantiate their position they must show who he ia. Those are indications of the line of attack which Serjeant Pony will take. In the Old Bailey Calendar the prisoner is entered as “forty-two years old.” The niissh g baronet’s age would Lo now fortyf j ir. Forty-two is the ago at which Arthur Orton would now have arrived ; and this circumstance is one of several which serve to ind’eate that counsel for the prosecution will endeavor to prove that the Claimant is the wandering Wappiug butcher. ' At the opening of the case, the learned counsel laid before the jury a narrative of the principal events in linger Tiolihorne’s life, down to the time he left for South America. At a further date it ia said that the trial continues to cucito the utmost interest.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST18730711.2.18

Bibliographic details

Dunstan Times, Issue 586, 11 July 1873, Page 3

Word Count
437

THE TICHBORNE TRIAL. Dunstan Times, Issue 586, 11 July 1873, Page 3

THE TICHBORNE TRIAL. Dunstan Times, Issue 586, 11 July 1873, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert