EXTENDED JURISDICTION. RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Before Wilson Grey, Esq., K.M. Clyde, 17th Sept., 1866. Wright and Carpenter v Patrick Kelly. Claim for £2B lis 9d goods delivered. No appearance of defendant. Judgment for amount and costs. Hume v Barr, claim for £36 4s sd, balance of wages as Postmaster at Clyde. Withdrawn. Krouse v Hillhouse, claim for £SB 15s wages due, Verdict for defendant. M'Leod v Proudfoot, claim £32 6s, work and labour done. Brown v the same, claim £39 19s. Both of these cases were for wages as workmen at the Kawarau Bridge. The Magistrate ruled that had the summonses been served on a Mr Pearce, he wonld have given a verdict for the plaintiffs ; there being no legal evidence to show the liability of Proudfoot. The Magistrate however gave them a certificate 3tatingthe 1 facts of the case, which certificate they i were recommended to forward to the Pro- ! vincial Secretary. Patrick Connor v Patrick Barrett, claim , for £BO, work and labour done. Settled out of Court. Kliza Crust v Patrick Connor, claim for i £46 8s 6d, board and lodging. Settled > out of Court.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST18660921.2.6
Bibliographic details
Dunstan Times, Issue 230, 21 September 1866, Page 2
Word Count
187EXTENDED JURISDICTION. RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dunstan Times, Issue 230, 21 September 1866, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in