CORRESPONDENCE.
THE CASE EEIDY V. IIEIDY. [To the Editor of the Daily Telegraph.] Sir, —With respect to that part of the report of the case Reidy v. Hiedy, where Mr Lee fays the Avholo thing , was the outcome of a row between the wives of complainant and defendant, I most solemnly declare such was not the case, as my wife had no communication whatever with the wife of the defendant for the last nine months. I make this declaration for fear of a wrong impression getting abroad as regards my wife. As my wife's name is assailed by such a slander, 1 consider it my duty to defend her name against such. Hoping you will insert the above,—l am, Arc., TItOSIA3 lililDY. Napier, January 4, l'6oo.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN18830104.2.10
Bibliographic details
Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 3582, 4 January 1883, Page 3
Word Count
126CORRESPONDENCE. Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 3582, 4 January 1883, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in