Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REPLY TO OPPOSITION

Question Of Gold Standard

“A wrong impression is apt to be created among tile public by the statement of the National Party's caucus decision concerning the international monetary fund.” said the Acting-Prime Minister, Mr. Sullivan, last evening. "It has been reported that, a caucus of the N ationai Party’s members came to ‘definite conclusions on important fundamentals.’ One of these expressed' ‘uncompromising hostility amt vehement opposition’ 'to any proposal to induce New Zealand to base its economy or currency on what was known ns the old gold standard.’ “If Unit,”'continued Mr. Sullivan, “has any meaning at all. it is that the National Party members believe that, the establishment of the international monetary fund as proposed would involve such a condition. This view is far from the truth.

As I have said on a previous occasion, and ns should be evident to anyone who had studied the proposals, the scheme for the establishment of the international monetary Jund now being debated in the United States does not involve a return to the gold standard in the old meaning of the term.

“May I quote Lord Keynes, one of the leading authorities in the world on the subject, who said. 'This is not a return to Hie gold standard. The plan has confirmed the dethronement of gold as a standard of value.’ Lord Keynes hailed the plan as ‘an epoch-making innovation far removed from the old orthodoxy.’ "It is to he noticed that Hie Leader of the National Party. Mr. Holland, has stated I bat his colleagues did not wish to express any final opinions on the probable outcome of Hie conference now lining .held in the I uited Slates of America." said Mr. Sullivan. "That is a prudent attitude, but it; is a pity, for the sake of securing an objective consideration of the plan by the public, that they had not decided to withhold any preliminary expression of opinion till they bad rid themselves of elementary inaccuracies."

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19440706.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 37, Issue 239, 6 July 1944, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
330

REPLY TO OPPOSITION Dominion, Volume 37, Issue 239, 6 July 1944, Page 4

REPLY TO OPPOSITION Dominion, Volume 37, Issue 239, 6 July 1944, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert