Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAGES OF JUNIORS

Effect Of General Order A question arising from the'general order of the Court of Arbitration directing an increase in award wages, made on March 31, was put before the Court this week for elucidation. The Court's order for a 5 per cent, increase does not apply in full to “juniors,” which the order defined as workers under 21. The amount of their wages above £l/10/-' a week was exempted from the order. The Freezing Workers’ award specifies, that you! hs over I'J shall be paid as adults, and the New Zealand Freezing Works and Related Trudes Industrial Association of Workers has applied to the Court'for provision to be made for workers under that award who are between -the ages of I'J and 2.1 lo receive the full increase. There are other awards in which the definition of a junior is different, from that in the Court’s general order. On behalf of the workers, Mr. W. E. Sill said the effect of the Court's order was to increase the wages of freezing workers between 19 and 21 by- 1/G, whereas their fellow workers, in the same category received an increase of 5/-. He submitted that as those workers were regarded as adult workers for the purpose of the award they should also be regarded as adult workers for the purpose of the Court’s general order. : For nearly 25 years the parties 'to the award had regarded them as entitled to adult wages and the Court had ratified, that provision. During the last freezing workers of that-age had received the cost of living bonuses. For the employers, who claimed tbit the Court had no jurisdiction to make the provision asked for. Mr. J. R. Hanlon submitted that the regulations under which the general order, was made permitted only a general order to be made and not one affecting a particular award. Further, there was 110 reason to suppose that the cost of. living of freezing workers between 19 and 21 had increased more than the cost of living of other workers, and the primary purpose of the order being to meet the cost of living, the order must fail. Decision was reserved.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19421024.2.110

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 36, Issue 25, 24 October 1942, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
363

WAGES OF JUNIORS Dominion, Volume 36, Issue 25, 24 October 1942, Page 10

WAGES OF JUNIORS Dominion, Volume 36, Issue 25, 24 October 1942, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert