Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RULE IN INDIA

Self-Government In Large Measure

REVIEW BY CRIPPS (British Official Wireless i RUGBY, August 23. Though he was emphatic that the formation of a Provisional Government an India while the war was in progress was impossible, the Lord Privy Seal, Sir Stafford Cripps, in an article written for the “New York Times,” and also published in London, reiterated the British Government’s promise of self-government for India after the war, and pointed out that a large measure of self-government was already enjoyed. British officials now in India, he stated, helped the'lndian Civil Service to administer the affairs of 389,000,000 people of various races and cultures. British officials and troops were no more numerous than those required to administer and police the Panama Canal Zone. Indians had been steadily taking over the government not only in the administrative services but also in the political direction of all India and the provinces of British India. Since 1937 the franchise in British India had risen from a few millions to 36,000,000, and the powers of provincial governments were comparable to those of an American State or a Canadian province. Four Indian provinces had native Cabinets and Premiers, and complete control of internal affairs was in their hands. Share in Central Control. It was only because the Congress Party had withdrawn from the responsibilities of power that control was not now exercised by Indians in all provinces. Indian share in the central Legislature had steadily increased till representation was now 11 Indians to four British. It was this Government that decided to take action against, the Congress Party, and that action, though approved, had not been suggested by the British Government.

Members of the Viceroy's Council were drawn from various sections in India. These men were ardent nationalists and not mere mouthpieces of Britain. They were conducting the government of India according to their convictions of what was in the best interests of the whole country. Two Indians were on their way to take their places in the British War Cabinet, and they would have full voice on all questions relating to, the conduct of the war as it affected India. LONDON, August 24.

Arson and looting are still occurring at Benares, and police opened fire in several instances. Four rioters and four police were killed at Dhampur, aud two rioters were killed at Cholapur.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19420825.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 280, 25 August 1942, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
392

RULE IN INDIA Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 280, 25 August 1942, Page 5

RULE IN INDIA Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 280, 25 August 1942, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert