MAIL CENSORSHIP
To the Editor. Sir—The following are from letters received from EgJP Y the same mail, the first ’ soldier unknown to me, the teeo d written, by my son. “Dear Madam,—l am returning a letter to von, which I think was destined for your son, but by some inefficiency on the part of censored our mail in New Ze. . , letter was put into my envelope and mine probably put into your son s am returning this letter m ease the e is something in it you wish your boy to know. The censor’s number is .1(>(>, if you earc to him a motherly to “Dear' l Motherl must tell you the bad. luck I had when I received your ln«t letter. The address was all in vour hand writing, but the letter inside was for someone else. The censor has most likely put my letter mto his envelope and this chaps into mine. It was bad luck, because there is no indication as to Who to send it on to. What is the good of us writing to our sons, when someone else receives their” letters? I feel positively sick when I think of such gross stupidity existing in one of the .most important of the Government departments.—l am, etc., DISGUSTED. Wellington, July 27.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19420730.2.56
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 258, 30 July 1942, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
215MAIL CENSORSHIP Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 258, 30 July 1942, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.