Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INDUSTRIAL LAW

Move For Reversion A national movement within the next few weeks to request the Government to amend the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act so as to re-' vive compulsory arbitration is forecast by an official of the Trades and Labour Council. Before the * amendment of 1932 matters in dispute which a conciliation counpil could not agree upon could be referred to the Arbitration Court at the wish of one side, but the amendment allowed some of the assessors to prevent the reference of a dispute to the court. At present, if a settlement of an industrial dispute is not arrived at in the Conciliation Council, the dispute, according to section 7, “shall be referred to the court for settlement if the following conditions are complied with, but not otherwise, namely: (a) In the case of a dispute to which section forty-one of the principal Act applies—(l) where there are four as-

sessors on each side, if at least three of the assessors on each side vote in - favour of a proposal that the dispute be so referred; (2) where there are Jess than four assessors on each side, if all the assessors vote in favour of a proposal that the dispute be so referred. (b) In the case of a dispute to which section fifty-eight (affecting two or more districts) of the principal Act applies—(l) where there are six or more assessors on each side, if at least five of the assessors on each side vote in favour of a proposal that the dispute be so referred; (2) where there are less than six assessors on each side, if all the assessors vote in favour of a proposal that the dispute be so referred.” In tlie; case of women workers the provision for compulsory arbitration in the event of a disagreement before the Conciliation Council is still in existence.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19350110.2.101

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 90, 10 January 1935, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
311

INDUSTRIAL LAW Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 90, 10 January 1935, Page 10

INDUSTRIAL LAW Dominion, Volume 28, Issue 90, 10 January 1935, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert