Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROPOSED NEW BRIDGE

AN INJUNCTION OBTAINED. Domin'"--. s-f.cial. Christchurch, December 4. "It seems to me that neither under sections 164 or 327 of the Municipal Corporations Act, nor under Section 119 of the Public Works Act, nor by the conjoint effect of all of them, has the council any legal authority to create a nuisance by the creation of the proposed bridge. The injunction therefore is granted with costs, which I fix at £35 and disbursements.” His Honour Mr. Justice Stringer gave reserved judgment in the Supreme Court to-day in the case concerning the proposal to build a new ferro-concrete bridge over the Avon at New Brighton. His judgment will prevent the New Brighton Borough Council from building the bridge unless the decision is appealed against successfully.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19261206.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 61, 6 December 1926, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
127

PROPOSED NEW BRIDGE Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 61, 6 December 1926, Page 8

PROPOSED NEW BRIDGE Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 61, 6 December 1926, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert