CIVIL ACTIONS

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 266, 4 August 1921, Page 7

CIVIL ACTIONS

quarterly sessions open on MONDAY ' THIRTY-SIX CASES TO BE HEARD Thn niiarterly civil sessions of the of the cases are:— Before a Judge and Jury of Twelve ZeXd d Cm%g£l™ damage'; f °Tho™s John Linton B burton ’ v. Jack alleged exnenses incurred (accounts) n . Connor , life’ 6 ** si&g » Limited. £750 damages for alleged negligence. Before a Judge and Jury of Four. Annie Eveline Maude Gorman v. Italia Cnriah £lOO repayment of money« alleged £ have been r paid and rccission of agree“aHcb Evn. Martin 'v- William Farquhar Eggers. £304 15s. 10d., refund of uTte-ed to have been paid and damnges for “alleged breach of, contract, cance - tion of agreement. Before a Judse Aiono. The Wellington Dairy Farmers’ Cooperative Association. Limited, y. Helen Mitchell Brown. £441 17s. 6d.. balance of money alleged to bo owing for jp. Ik. Counter-claim, £471 16s. 3d '. a nmni>ig Edna fleheelo v. George Alfred Denning nnd AValter AVilliam Houghton (third pnrty) rocission nproement. £4OO. repayment of moneys paid. pn» Harold Linney and Sidney Edgar P le and Alfred Carrick v. Eva May Sample, probate in solemn form- _ The Belmont Quarry Company, Limited, nnd others v. Thomas AVearne and Samuel Vickery Burridge. declaration and accounts. . _ , „ Tho AVellington Dairy Farmers Co-opera-tive Association, Limited, v. the Mayor, etc., of the City of Wellington. £5038 8«. sd„ money alleged to bo duo for milk SU Ernest' Anderson v. Burns nnd Sons, £165 damages for alleged negligence. D 11. Cooper v. C. Av. Anderson and F. L. Howarth, £274 65., payments alleged to be due. , . Horace Graham Rutter v. Andrew Cochran, specific performance of agreement. Joseph Parker and Thomas Ramsay Cooke v. Ethel Emily Howell. £287 1 oa., moneys alleged to bo due under agreem Ohnrlea Gny Powles and others V. Thomas Balfour Mason, £1251 damages fo>- alleged fraud and costs of goods sola. Penelope Taggart Beath v. Walter Ernest Russell and John Logan Stout, reclsaion of agreement, repayment of ±,720. John Fisher v. Frank Hutchinson, dissolution of partnership. . Geoffrey Hoggard v. C. B. L p ™ l \ ri t " e Co £273 Ifi. Bd- for goods alleged to nav b ßonn U Springnll v. the New Zealand Express Company, £485 175.. for goods alleged ?>Htehett eC 'Limlted. v. John Burns and Company, Limited, £3OOO for alleged damages. William A. J. Wycherley. Limited, v. William Daniell Bacon injunction nnd £joo fo. alleged damages. AnderHis Majesty tho Kinf v. 11. G. Aimer 'Marlon < Moore V°Al exander* Moom'acJ™ ” vnlno £471 3h. 6d. _ - Limited. £593 Bs. B’l.. moneys alleged to be d, peter llt Nichohi" tS Brannigan t. . J ? oC 'be Saba £133 fa- 4 d.. moneys alleged to be d Teiard v. Andrew Martin Carroll, possession and mesne-pro-George Philip and Florence Jane ‘Corv. it phlUn v Joseph Edward Westerhy, SXotion of valid’recission of contract U J d h^ 2 Esin P Mites v. Samuel Prestcridge. PO 4 F r;o i ß^r a d7L ni rAll^t, t Drlng. pos.es- ■ p r rJ ,1 nn sp-PR for alleged trespass. •’MaHa Con” v Thomas Murray, posees,lon and mesne profits.