Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ARMOUR CASE

AN IMPORTANT PRECEDENT

WASHINGTON AND WELLINGTON Attention has been drawn to the fact that the exchange of communications between the United States Government and the New Zealand Government, through the American Consul-General, regarding the refusal of a meat export license to Armour and Company of Australasia has created a precedent. It has been the custom in the past for official communications between Washington and Wellington io go through the channel of the Colonial Office in London.

Referring to this point yesterday, tho Acting-Prime Minister (Sir Francis Bell) Baid that on other occasions the American Government had sent communications through the American Consul-Gen-eral. But on the advice of the late Solicitor-General the New Zealand Government had always replied that while it was ready to give the Consul-General every assistance in gathering information for himself, it could communicate with the United States Government only through the Secretary of State for the Colonies. Tho direct reply that had been sent regarding tho Armour case was a new departure. Sir Francis Bell added that he was informed that Armour and Company of Australasia had about a million carcasses, mostly lamb, in the freezing stores in New Zealand. This meat had been bought without a license to export. The quantity was large enough to seriously disturb the London market if the company chose to act in hostility to New Zealand. Parliament had made clear provision to prevent a company of this kind acting as an exporter *of New Zealand meat, and the Government was not prepared to permit evasion of the law.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210531.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 210, 31 May 1921, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
260

THE ARMOUR CASE Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 210, 31 May 1921, Page 4

THE ARMOUR CASE Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 210, 31 May 1921, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert