Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MARTINBOROUGH RETURNED SOLDIER’S GRIEVANCE

Sir, —In your issue of March 12 was a letter headed "Featherston Soldier Settlers’ Grievance.” Now, whether Messrs. Arcus and Holmes are unreasonably trying to force their neighbour io fence and cause him heavy expense, or whether the road is poached up by the hundreds of dairy cows that aro driven over it to graze on Holmes’s or Arcus's sections in winter , or by their neighbours’ cattle, does not interest me. Mr. M’Leod, M.P., is reported to have stated that the said returned eoldiers had been put on tho land without ballot or oompetition, and inferred that they had been given in unfair advantage over other returned eoldiers. Now, my grievances refer to tho above. I am a returned soldier, having done over three years’ active service, and before I enlisted I had been waiting to try my luck at the ballot on the Hikawera and Mahapuku Settlement Government sections when they would be thrown open for ejection, because it is easily the best grazing country in the Mairarapa or the North Island for that mat ternene lietter. I got back to find it all gone to those soldiers who got their discharges first (which was easy to got at first), and I have been trying eier since I came back to get a piece of decent grazing land, and cannot. 1 consider such good land was cut up into too large sections. There ought to be double the number of solibere settled on it. The argnment-not suitwon’t hold water, , for look at Tablelands, 50 per cent., inferior land, cut up in 245 acres 18 yeare ago. and all have done well on it. Mhy should one returned soldier hare a town house and live the life of a retired .gentleman and anoth<jr scrap© a living xntn a longhandled shovel. I consider such land ought to have been held till we were all back. X , Now, as regards Messrs. Holmes and Arcus’s remark that Mr. M’Leod has evidently had very little to do with returned soldiers, this shows now little they know what they are talking al'out because there is po man in the district who has had more to do, or done more, for tho returned soldier than Mr. A D. M'Leod. —T nm. etc.. MARTINBOROTTGH RETURNED SOLDIER.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210402.2.126.4

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 160, 2 April 1921, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
383

MARTINBOROUGH RETURNED SOLDIER’S GRIEVANCE Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 160, 2 April 1921, Page 12

MARTINBOROUGH RETURNED SOLDIER’S GRIEVANCE Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 160, 2 April 1921, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert