Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FARROW’S BANK CRASH

ASTOUNDING DISCLOSURES AT POLICE COURT ALLEGED FRAUDULENT BALANCE-SHEETS ■r T»l**r»Dh-Fr»«« IsKtoiatlon-Oopyrirb' London, January 19. There were astounding disclosures at the Police Court prosecution of the officials of Farrow’s Bank at the Guildhall. Sir Richard Muir, K.C., in his opening statement, said that in May, 1920, the New York firm, Norton, Read, and Company, with a London house, agreed to acquire a controlling interest in the bank by providing .£500,000, of which £400,000 was to be placed to the reserve account, "and .£lOO,OOO was for the compensation of Thomas ■ Farrow and other directors who would retire. Mr. Read, the London partner of the Norton, Read Company, was dissatisfied with his examination of the books, some of which were withheld, and called in chartered accountants in November. They eventually informed him that the bank was hopelessly insolvent, whereupon the agreement was cancelled. Counsel suggested that the idea of Farrow and Crotch was that when the crash came, Read, being enmeshed in this fraudulent business, would shoulder the financial burden to save his honour and credit, and prevent exposure. Crotch, who was the-leading spirit of the concern, apparently owed the bank between .£lOO.OOO and .£200,000, of which <£35,000 stood in the name of a certain lady. Counsel said that with the exception of the first portion of 1908 the bank had done nothing but make losses, ranging from £ll,OOO in 1909 to .£203,000 in 1920, and aggregating d 11,107,000, quite apart from the loss by the depreciation of securities, which must be considerable. All this time the bank was paying interest to depositors and shareholders. This must have been paid out of capital, and the losses concealed by fictitious values of book assets. One asset which appeared, £780,000 due from a cement company, was wholly fictitious. The reserve fund was also wholly fictitious. A cupboard broken open in Hart’s room revealed papers showing how tho fraudulent bal-ance-sheets were prepared for each year. A document was prepared showing the true position of affairs, and thus Hart “cooked” tho balance-sheet.—Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210122.2.67

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 101, 22 January 1921, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

FARROW’S BANK CRASH Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 101, 22 January 1921, Page 7

FARROW’S BANK CRASH Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 101, 22 January 1921, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert