Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUKEKAWA MURDER

THE TRIAL OF THORN EVIDENCE BY DECEASED'S WIDOW I. By Telegraph—Preßs A ißooiatloa "" • Auckland, November 16. The trial of Samuel John Thorn, charg--ed : with-murdering Sydney Seymour Eyre atJ Pukekawn on August 24, was con- , tinned in the Supremo Court to-day. Mrs, Byre, widow of the deceased, was put through a searching cross-examina-tion by counsel for the accused, lasting in all for six hours. "Within a few hours of the shot being fired," said Mrs. ' Eyre, in answer to Mr. Singer, "I thought it was Thorn. I believed it was Thorn.". She added that slio heard footsteps outside tho house similar to accused's. '■ * Counsel: Bid you not say in the Magistrate's Court that ifce steps were short, ■ ' quick, and heavy, and was not that one of the Teasons you thought they were Thorn's? 1 Witness: Yes. > She admitted that in effect she said • to herself that tho report of, the gun ■was like'that of accused's gun. By the >■' time tha police camo she thought Thorn was iihe only one -who could hare ceminitted! the murder. Mrs. Byre said that her husband always treated her kindly; lie never drove her to tears, and ho never, sworo at her, . although lie was addicted to swearing if he was upset. ReverHing to her relationship with Thorn, ■' .witness said that at first she thought ac- - cused was a decent fellow, but shortly V -after the relationship began she had nothing buti contempt for him. That was caused partly by his familiarity towards ■ I her, and partly by his threats. Bv tho : time her husband returned-, she disliked '.Thorn. , : Counsel: Why did not you tell your ■ I husband, and let him shoot Thorn? I Witness: 'I'did not; want my .husband •to be branded as a murderer. ' Mrs. Eyre denied that she had ever • ! asked Thorn if he could get a divorce, lor vtethbr if ho ,coul<l get rid of his V '.wiU be wotild marry lier in the event :«P anything happening to her husband. 1 After Byre's return he received lottos .from abroad. f His Honour: What is the relevancy of 'that? ' , , : . Mr. Singer: It may have been someone 'from abroad, perhaps Canada, who comimitted the murder. - '• Witness said that her hnslmnd . lm- : ''mediately destroyed these letters, and , never referred to the persons who sent them. She never worried nbout whether the writers were men or women. ... She saw an advertisement in a paper, find she showed it to her husband. _ • . Counsel: It was someone advertising * for yout husband? ■ i His Honour: You cannot! put that dnestion without putting in the adver- , tispracnt. . , ... Counsel I'Sotae time after that did' your husband receive a letter in cypher? Witness: Ido not know. She added 'that she did not think the advertisement was mysterious, and she did not know •who inserted it. Touching another point, witness said : tlhat she saw accused-at the - Tunkan police station on September 4. After o. greeting between the two, Thorn s first : remark, so far as she recollected, was • • that he had always found her a truthful woman, ffliat the b«>ys were truthful, and that he had nothing against the family. • He aWo stated that he did not suggest • that witness or any of tlho children killed Mr. Eyre. Wlien the polic* went out. Thorn asked what made her think he had killed her husband. She replied: *'The- circumstances. The person, "who did it .must have known the position of the bed and iihe Tun . of tho place. . Thorn said: "As true as I.am here, I Tiever did it." * "Witness replied: Tr you are innocent, I feel sorry for you." 'In further answer to Mr. Singer, Mts. T.yre admitted that she said to the accused" "Taking the wholo circumstances, • I cannot say anyone else. The person who-did it must, have known the whole ■ ' run of the place. At first I did not say anything about you, but when 1 thought ' it over thoroughly, and tried you in my. own mind, I could not think of anyone . but vou that would.do it." Evidence was civen by Sidney Eyre, azed 16 vears, a son of the deceased.. Ho said that his father and accused did not i eet on well together. From expressions ' which were used, he knew his fa'lher was an object of dislike.by Thorn. Witness detailed the happenings on the night of the murder. He was. briefly crossexamined bv Mr. Singer. . Dora Millicent Eyre, sistpr of 'the last Witness', 1 and others gave evidence before the .Courii adjourned for the day. .

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201117.2.72

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 45, 17 November 1920, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
750

PUKEKAWA MURDER Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 45, 17 November 1920, Page 8

PUKEKAWA MURDER Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 45, 17 November 1920, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert