"I've littlo faith in expert evidence (riven after the event to contost known results." rcmnvked Mr, J. W. Poynton, S.M.. at Auckland this week, when a solicitor stressed tho valuo of expert 'evidenco relating to a motor-car collision with a pedestrian. : The Magistrate recalled that the s.s. Te Anau onco collided in Sydney harbour with If.M.S. Powerful, and despite a host of expert evidence that the effect of sitoli collision must be a crumpling, up of the merchant vessel the fact remained that in actual fact the Te Anau suffered barely moro than the scratching of her paint, while .£2OOO worth of damage wns done to tho warship. He added that in tho case before him. a charge of dangerous driving, the exnert evidence could not explain nwav tho fact of collision with a pedestrian at a street crusinp in Eden Terrace. Taken with tho circumstances, it showed that high speed was not an element of the accident, but there remained tho question of iimtteutiveness by the driver, who "would bo fined £3 arid oosts. ■—'Star." ' "Labour and Parliament: The Work of the .Scission," will bo tho title of nn 'address to bo delivered by Mr. P.. Frnspr, M.P., at the Alexandra Hall on Sunday •vciiin;? at 8.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201113.2.92.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 42, 13 November 1920, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
208Page 10 Advertisements Column 1 Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 42, 13 November 1920, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.