Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT

CIVIL SESSION ON MONDAY. Their Honours Mr. Justice Edwards and Mr. Justice Salmond will nreside over the civil sessions of the Supreme Court. which will be commenced on Monday. • Following is the list of cases to bo dealt with, the plaintiff's name leine first given in each instance, with the cause of .action following the name of each defendant:— ' Before a Judge and jury of twelve:— Moggie Parker v. Stanley Horace Parker and Herbert Hart and Allan Francis Hogg. £585. money said,to bo due: Isabella Cairns v. H.' W. Frost, rescission of contract: Laery and Co. and Century Mercantile Co. v. Union Steam Ship Co. of New Zealand. Ltd., £1813 3s. Id., damages for alleged negligence: Herbert Henry Cook v. Arthur Daniell Kennedy. £687, alleged to be due on promissory note:. Vacuum Oil Co. Pron., Ltd., v. Union Steam. Shin . Co.. £3721 Bs. 10d„ for alleged negligence; William Henry Peter Barber v. .Tames Fairfteld. "Wills .Dickson, and Frank Boy Barber, possession or chattels: Alexander A. Nattrass v. Nattrass and Harris Motor Co.. Ltd.. £1136 compensation for alleged breach of agreement, counter-claim £488 Bs. Id., money due: Frederick de Jersey Clare v. Albert August Benner and Johaim Helnrich Meyer. £1033. for alleged, breach of con. tract: Wellington Publishing Co.. Ltd.. v. Onion Steam.Ship 'Co., £1975 10s.. damages for alleged b'reach of contract: K. Wood and Son. Etd., v. Sniral and Lopkbar Steel Pine Co. of N.Z.. Ltd.. £636 fis. 5d., for work done: Arthur Leigh Hunt v. H. BereHforid Maunsell. £1500. for allciirod slander: William Ednyrd Timmings v. George .Treadgold, £1509 10s.. for alleged loss of rent: James Furniss v. Wellington Publishing Co.. Ltd.. and A. Sando, £1000 damages, for alleged libel: Ueorge Henry Anderson v. Robert Rowland Cap£llU7 19s. 3d., amount alleged to be due under contract.

Before a Jndec alono:—Myra. Campbell v r ' Elizabeth. Green. .£450. for allcped breach of. agreement: llrifitol and Dominions Producers' Association. Ltd.. anfl M'Neill and Co. v.: Union Steam Ship Co. of N.Z., Ltd., and W. H. Grove and Sons. £5i9 6s,j.damaces for. poods allerrert to be delivered: Ilobort Arthur Hamilton v. 0. M. Cox. £409 10s., balance of Ditrchaße money, etc.. eoitnterclaim, rescission of contract: Sarah Ireson v. Ednumd James Ireson, £292 9b. Ltd., moneys ullccrcri to.Jjo due: Frank Lloyd Williams and Georce Killiek* Williams v. Saimond and Spraepon. Ltd., £230 \9s„ damaces for alleged nefrlieence: James Knicht and Albert Ernest Kosb t. Alexander Oswald and Thomas W. flill, possession of lands and £400 damages; Henry Olcon and Co. Prop., Ltd., t, Thompson flros.. Ltd., £322 2a. 9d.. allied breach of contract: John Henry Bidavray v. Kueo E. Andrews and Tir'a Arika. action to rescind contract* Elizabeth Miller v. Geortre William Jenncr, action to rescind contract, counter-claim, | specific performpnee of agreement, ctc.t Susan Alice Hosic v. David Stone, pobri'nsion of land: Central Club, Ltd.. v. Hubert Collard Brice. specific . performance of agreement: Frederick Percv Welch v Amy Ethel Cjeland and Alfred Richard-1 son Jleek. £379. for commission: Edna Scheele v. Georce Alfred Dennlne. action to rescind agreement-. etc.: Ode«ea Gemma Tonjts v. Herbert Thomas Barnen and liose Ilarnes. poaseasion of landsAnnie Deckaton v. Erncet John August nosefMihn of lands, etc.: Wollincton Milk «f on w«i'i< A , BBOcf r tto *i- •• T - M<wr. etc., of welllnelon. Inquiry and acrounta etc • Jincrv. Beverldec and Co.. Ltd v TT (V Harnett. £245 13c. 4<1.. balance' tillcircd to bo due: Horace Grnnani flutter t. ah. «ero'cmem weciflo werformanco if

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201105.2.61

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 35, 5 November 1920, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
574

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 35, 5 November 1920, Page 7

SUPREME COURT Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 35, 5 November 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert