AUCKLAND DIVORCE CASE
By TeleKraßh—Presi Auoolntion. Auckland, November 3. Tho divorce case in which Mary Andrews sought o dissolution of her marriag,; with Ernest Frank Andrews, was concluded m the Supreme Court to-day. His Honour said the case was an important one. A serious charge was made against th© respondent, and if tliero was a reasonable doubt respondent should have tho bejiclit of that doubt. The jury, after a retirement lasting two hours, returned n verdict in favour of resp'on&nt. They stated that in their opinion there was not sufficient evidence to prove adultery. His Honour said lie quite agreed with the verdict; he was sure he would have como to the same decision himeiolf. An order was made lor payment of the wife's costs by respondent, the amount to be fixed by this Court if the parties fail io agi^e.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201104.2.54
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 34, 4 November 1920, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
141AUCKLAND DIVORCE CASE Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 34, 4 November 1920, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.