Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

JUDGE STRINGER'S STRICTURES

Sir,—EreSs Association news of October 2 with reference to Arbitration Court stated that His Honour made severe comment on the Labour Department, etc. To any person who has studied the question which 'brought forth tli|!Se remarks from the learned Judge it reads as if the Arbitration- Court is being boomcrangcd. At different periods during the last Un years tho Court has been a6ked to bring "home-made cake shops" and tearooms employing pastrycooks or eakemnkerts under tho provisions of the award in their particular district, and their attention, as well as th ; a Labour Department's," has been drawn to the fact that these places are not registered factories under the Factories Act. The Factories Act reads: "A bakehouse is a place where food is prepared for sale or consumption by the- public." 'Die Arbitration Court lias repeatedly declined to bring these places under either of these conditions, and consequently these places, have teen "unregisterd factories" for years past. Now if a woman made n shirt at home and 'sold it through a shop it would be a serious offence —made in an unregistered factorv-but the Arbitration Court considers that the pastrycook should not have any protection, consequently I lie unregistered factories havia increased, and the position is this: that if a pastrycook" wishes to manufacture cakes he ha» to employ journeymen at award wages and work under factory conditions, whereas a home-made cake shop or tearoom's caa employ girls to Manufacture and work under the Shops and Oifi-'es Act which is not so rigid as thefactories 'let. So it seems to 1110 that the Arbitration Court arc really Warning lie Labour Uepartnwnt for having tho audacih- to point out the Court's own weakness. It is remarkable the sympathy of the Court towards .this side-stepping of the first principles of unionism, am, etc. jj[.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201026.2.83.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 26, 26 October 1920, Page 10

Word count
Tapeke kupu
305

JUDGE STRINGER'S STRICTURES Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 26, 26 October 1920, Page 10

JUDGE STRINGER'S STRICTURES Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 26, 26 October 1920, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert