Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR. WATT'S RESIGNATION

« STATEMENT REPLIED TO BY MR. ' HUGHES. Melbourne, October 21. Mr. W. SI. Hughes, replying to Mr. Watt, said that even if he did meddle with Mr. Watt's business that was no reason for Mr. Watt resigning. Mr. Watt should have completed his task and complained l on returning to Australia, No Government could give the authority demanded by Mr. Watt. His reouest involved a principle, and abrogated the very basis of responsible government. • The matter then- dropped. The general impression is that Mr. Watt's speech was a disappointment. It is suggested m some quarters'that his resignation arose through the clashing of two strong personalities'—Press Assn. >

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201022.2.33

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 23, 22 October 1920, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
108

MR. WATT'S RESIGNATION Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 23, 22 October 1920, Page 6

MR. WATT'S RESIGNATION Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 23, 22 October 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert