SUPREME COURT BUSINESS
CIVIL AND DIVOVCB FIXTUBES MADE. Fixtures for the hearing of civil and divorce- cases in the Supreme Court have been made as under:— August 9.-Wo!lington City Corporation v. Wellington Milk Vendors' Association, Ltd., action for costs. August 10—Undefended divorce, cases. August 11—Thomas Richard Southall v. Elizabeth Marjory Southall and John William Shaw M'Arthur, petition for divorce. August 12,-Eobert James Stevenson v. Eleanor Stevenson, petition for divorce; Henry John Simpson v. Lazarus Wolfo Balkind, application for review of money lending transaction, and for an injunction (Balkind counter-claims .£sl). August. 13.-Thomas Hull v. Walter James Gardner and William John March, suit for «C 530 damages for alleged ncgliAug'ust 14.—Myra Campbell v. Elizabeth Green, suit for .£450 damages for alleged breach of agreement; AttorneyGeneral v. Public Trustee, action for approval and settlement- of a ey pres scheme. ' , . August IG.—Bristol and Dominions Producers' Association Ltd. v. Michael Thomas Kcnnelly, suit for .C7G4 19s. 10d„ moneys alleged to bo due, with counter- j claim for .£257 damages; Jxirna Dorothy Bell Gardner v. Charles Richard Gardner, petition for divoroe. August 17—Bristol and Dominions Producers' Association Ltd., and another, v. Union Steam Ship Company and W. H. Grove and Sons Ltd., suit for X'sl9 65., value of goods alleged to have, been wrongfully delivered; Cyril William Tanner v. Ann Tanner, petition j for divorce; Cadman v. Public Trustee, | arbitration.
August 18.—Lydia Hansigne Martekilde Scliultz v. Sigmund Schultz, petition for divorce.
August 19—Arthur Leigh Hunt v, John Joseph Bryce, suit for .£3OOO damages for alleged slander; Wilson v. Wilson.
August 2f1.---Annio Olsen v. the Crown, suit for .£2OOO damages for alleged negligence; Annio M'Erlean v. 'Wellington City Corporation, suit for JESSO damages for injuries. August 21.—Edward Hand and Samuel Cornor v. George Dorno, claim for specific performance, of agreement. August 23.—Robert Charles Dick v. James Judge and others, suit for ,£2OOO damages for alleged libel. August 24—Leonard Alfred Bond v. Michael Gallaghnn, claim for specific, performance of agreement; Public Trustee v. Phillips. August 25.—Coulter v. Coulter. August 26.—John' Dinecn v. Jjlcwellyn Hathaway, suit for ,£412 10s. for alleged misrepresentation and breach of warranty. September I—Ernest 'Wliittater Mex(ed v, Charles Edward Greer, claim for specific performance of agreement, and .£IOO damages. September B—James M'Lellan v. Jf. L. Taploy and Co., claim for .£294, alleged to bo due under contract, with counter-claim, for ;£SSO damages for alleged 'breach of contract.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200809.2.46
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 270, 9 August 1920, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
393SUPREME COURT BUSINESS Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 270, 9 August 1920, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in