Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEATHER AND BOOTS

NEW AUSTRALIAN DUTIES ON IMPORTED EOOTWEAB.

Among thoso who returned from Australia on Monday by tho Ulimaroa was Mr. C. J. Ward, the vice-president of the Wellington Industrial Association, and a well-known local hoot manufacturer. Mr Ward, in the course of a brief chat, mentioned a big campaign in favour of locally-manufactured goods which had been launched in Australia, by the Manufacturers' Association, aided by tho Commonwealth and State Governments. There had been several spurts with the same object in view previously, but tins appeared to be the real thing, and would have an appreciable effect on imports-tions-at least, of such goods as could bo produced conveniently within the Lornmonwcallh. The Commonwealth Government for instance, had imposed a new Customs tariff on imported footwear, which should give local manufacturers a chance. The new tariff, initiated only a fortnight ago, imposed a duty of .40. por cent, (on invoice value) on British boots mid shoes, and of 50 por cent, on baots and shoes from any other country. Tho New Zealand tariff on British boots and shoes ratified from 6d. to Is. (id. per pair, plus 15 per cent, ad valorem, and on boots and shoes from any other country an extra 7J per cent, ad valorem, so it would be's&cti that Australia, was hitting the importer hard to help along tho local manufacturer. As far ns tho shoe trade in Australia was concerned, said Mr. Ward, the manufacturers had just about caught, un to the peak demand, and were breathing a little moro freely. That had not affected prices so far; indeed, prices inclined to harden. There were reports about the price of Mdos decreasing, but that actually was not the case. The prico of some hides had receded, certainly, but that reference wus to drought hides, which wero light. The prices of good hides were as high as over in Australia, and yet no foreign buyers had operated on tho Australian markets for six weeks past. The preponderance or hides offering wcro from drought-stricken districts (where in many cases tho cattle had been killed for their hides alone), nnd these wcro often very light. Foreign buyers do net want light hides.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200527.2.66

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 207, 27 May 1920, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
365

LEATHER AND BOOTS Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 207, 27 May 1920, Page 6

LEATHER AND BOOTS Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 207, 27 May 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert