Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

U.S. NAVAL INQUIRY

« " BRITISH ADMIRALTY TOO CAUTIOUS" l j DEALING WITH SUBMARINE i DANGER d t a By Telegraph—Proßß Association—Copyright (Reo. May 13, 5.5 p.m.) ~ j 1 ' Washington, May 12. i" Sensational- disclosures are contained in the evidence of Mr. Daniels More • -tho Naval Investigation Committee. A l telegram which President Wilson Gent g to the British Admiralty disclosed the fact that he was not satisfied with the way in which the Admiralty was direct-, ° ing the work of the British Navy. Pre- . 6ident Wilson was unable to understand j why the British experts were unwilling „ to allow the American Naval Department f to toll them how things ought to he done. ; He considered tho Admiralty too cautious :" nn having failed to use its great naval superiority against submarines, and askl ed Admiral Sims for independent suggesD tions as if the British Admiralty, did not 8 exist. In a message to Admiral Sims, e President Wilson -said' the Admiralty np- ■? peared helpless to the point of panic in the face of the submarine danger. Ad--0 miral Sims's reply to President Wil- ? son's telegram, according to Mr, Daniels. lC merely recited generalities'as-to what ;e the, Admiralty actually "ere accomplish--0 ing. letters written by Admiral Sims ; " to Mr. Page. Ambassador in London, 0 pointed out that President Wilson cviu, dontly regarded Admiral Sims as owned '!' body and soul by the British Admiralty, lt: and seriously considered his replacement 6 by another officer more amenablo to the i 0 American Naval Department. Answering ? President Wilson's charge that tho Bri- !" tish were too cautious", Admiral Sims out- '' lined a combined land and sea attack on ?' tho Belgian coast, including a Zeebrugge , landing. Admiral Sims expressed the '* opinion that this was sufficiently audaci- , ou's to ploase even President Wil6on.. Ad- * miral Sims, according to Mr. Daniels, disapproved of the American plans deal,J ing with, submarines as impracticable. " They had already been' tested by Britain '„ and found unworkable. Mr. Daniels as- \ sertcd that Admiral Sims was so hypnot--1 ised by the Admiralty that he tried to 1 luro the President into feeling tlmt.regarding fuburo developments, the United '" States could always reply on the British Navy—Aus.-N.Z, Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200514.2.58

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 196, 14 May 1920, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
361

U.S. NAVAL INQUIRY Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 196, 14 May 1920, Page 7

U.S. NAVAL INQUIRY Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 196, 14 May 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert